Eric M. Freedman says the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Landrigan case was “crime pays”
Arizona Executes Inmate After Supreme Court Clears Way
By John Schwartz
New York Times
October 27, 2010
Excerpt:
Eric M. Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University, said that the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Landrigan case was “crime pays.”
He explained: “The state flatly stonewalled the lower courts by defying orders to produce information, and then was rewarded at the Supreme Court by winning its case on the basis that the defendant had not put forward enough evidence. That is an outcome which turns simple justice upside-down and a victory that the state should be ashamed to have obtained.”
About LawNews
LawNews To submit a news story, or request an interview with one of Hofstra Law's faculty experts, please contact Andrew Berman, assistant dean for communications, at andrew.e.berman@hofstra.edu.
Related Posts
Prof. Robin Charlow Quoted in Article on Lawsuit Protesting Subtandard Education in Yeshivas →
Prof. Ronald Colombo Comments in Law360 Story on SEC’s Post-Lucia Offer to Rehear Cases →
Hofstra Law’s Faculty Ranks in Top 50 for Scholarly Impact in 2018 →
