Eric M. Freedman says the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Landrigan case was “crime pays”
Arizona Executes Inmate After Supreme Court Clears Way
By John Schwartz
New York Times
October 27, 2010
Excerpt:
Eric M. Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University, said that the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Landrigan case was “crime pays.”
He explained: “The state flatly stonewalled the lower courts by defying orders to produce information, and then was rewarded at the Supreme Court by winning its case on the basis that the defendant had not put forward enough evidence. That is an outcome which turns simple justice upside-down and a victory that the state should be ashamed to have obtained.”
About LawNews
LawNews To submit a news story, or request an interview with one of Hofstra Law's faculty experts, please contact Andrew Berman, assistant dean for communications, at andrew.e.berman@hofstra.edu.
Related Posts
Prof. Julian Ku Quoted on Legalities of Canada’s Arrest of Chinese Tech CFO in Globe and Mail →
Prof. Julian Ku’s Tweet on Chinese Tech Exec’s Arrest Quoted in NYT, Sydney Morning Herald →
Prof. Irina Manta Writes Washington Post Op-Ed Calling for Legal Penalty for Online Sexual Fraud →