Eric M. Freedman says the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Landrigan case was “crime pays”
Arizona Executes Inmate After Supreme Court Clears Way
By John Schwartz
New York Times
October 27, 2010
Excerpt:
Eric M. Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University, said that the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Landrigan case was “crime pays.”
He explained: “The state flatly stonewalled the lower courts by defying orders to produce information, and then was rewarded at the Supreme Court by winning its case on the basis that the defendant had not put forward enough evidence. That is an outcome which turns simple justice upside-down and a victory that the state should be ashamed to have obtained.”
About LawNews
LawNews To submit a news story, or request an interview with one of Hofstra Law's faculty experts, please contact Andrew Berman, assistant dean for communications, at andrew.e.berman@hofstra.edu.
Related Posts
Prof. Ellen Yaroshefsky Quoted on DOJ’s Stance on Post-Conviction Prosecutor Rule in Law360 →
Prof. Julian Ku Quoted in New York Times Story on Recent Events in US Case Against Huawei →
Prof. Barbara Barron Quoted in New York Times on Changes to Harvey Weinstein’s Defense Team →
