Prof. Eric M. Freedman Quoted in NY Times Story ‘Cohen Implicates President Trump. What Do Prosecutors Do Now?’

Eric M. Freedman, Siggi B. Wilzig Distinguished Professor of Constitutional Rights

Cohen Implicates President Trump. What Do Prosecutors Do Now?
By Adam Liptak and Jim Rutenberg
The New York Times
Aug. 21, 2018

The most prominent dissenter from the prevailing view is Eric M. Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University and the author of a 1999 law review article that made the case for allowing criminal prosecution of incumbent presidents.

Professor Freedman wrote that granting sitting presidents immunity from prosecution was “inconsistent with the history, structure and underlying philosophy of our government, at odds with precedent and unjustified by practical considerations.”

He pointed out that other federal officials who are subject to impeachment, including judges, have been indicted while in office. Courts have rejected the argument that impeachment is the sole remedy for such officials.

Read the full article at nytimes.com.

You can read Professor Freedman’s 1999 Hofstra Law Review article on the Law School’s Scholarly Commons website.

Latest Tweets

  • Thanks for being on the panel! #HofstraLaw https://t.co/iJ4TTJXOhY
    about 8 hours ago
  • Thank you for participating in the event! #HofstraLaw https://t.co/x85DNq7GQn
    about 8 hours ago
  • Yesterday, more than 25 law students from the Veterans Legal Assistance Project (VLAP) volunteered at our one-day V… https://t.co/ywuPKxqQQg
    about 3 days ago
  • Article by Prof. Norman Silber and Alumnus Steven Stites ’13 Published in Virginia Law & Business Review https://t.co/NHY1aBK2jY
    about 3 days ago
  • Thanks for attending! https://t.co/E8SlaUtkwY
    about 6 days ago
  • Thank you for your continued support of the Law School! https://t.co/Jgi5kEF0QS
    about 6 days ago