Faculty Notes

Prof. Irina Manta’s Article on Online Dating Fraud, ‘Tinder Lies,’ Published in Wake Forest Law Review

Irina D. Manta, Professor of Law

The article “Tinder Lies” by Professor Irina D. Manta, associate dean for research and faculty development, was published in the Wake Forest Law Review (54 Wake Forest Law Review 207 [2019]) earlier this month.

The article examines the world of online dating and its possible legal ramifications.

Abstract
The rise of Internet dating — in recent years especially through the use of mobile-based apps such as Tinder or Bumble — forces us to reexamine an old problem in the law: how to handle sexual fraud. Many people with romantic aspirations today meet individuals with whom they do not share friends or acquaintances, which allows predators to spin tales as to their true identities and engage in sexual relations through the use of deceit on a greater scale than was previously practicable. Indeed, according to some studies, about eighty percent of individuals lie on at least some part of their online dating profiles, and a subset of those individuals tell lies that undermine their sexual mates’ subsequent ability to give consent. Whether and how to criminalize this type of fraudulent behavior has been debated for some time, and the difficulties involved in prosecutions in this context have made criminal law a fairly ineffective tool. Previous proposals for tort recovery have failed to gain many adherents for similar reasons, and courts have been unwilling to extend existing tort doctrines due to a reluctance to legally recognize noneconomic harms. This Article seeks to strike a new path by first proposing that we harness the tools of trademark law to reduce search costs and deception in the dating marketplace, just like we do in the economic marketplace. Second, it argues that we should use a streamlined process through small claims courts to discourage behaviors that may bring significant dignitary, emotional, and other harms to people’s lives and to offer victims a pragmatic path to legal recovery. Third, it proposes the use of statutory damages to alleviate the difficulties in accurately gauging the remedy level for the harm from a given instance of sexual fraud. By providing recovery in cases of material lies, like trademark law does in cases involving deceptive marks, this Article takes an important step towards aligning the legal framework of sexual fraud with those of other types of misrepresentation, incentivizing transparency in the increasingly murky dating world, and protecting individuals’ ability to meaningfully consent to sexual relations.

Read the full article (PDF) on the SSRN website.

Latest Tweets

  • Thanks for being on the panel! #HofstraLaw https://t.co/iJ4TTJXOhY
    about 8 hours ago
  • Thank you for participating in the event! #HofstraLaw https://t.co/x85DNq7GQn
    about 8 hours ago
  • Yesterday, more than 25 law students from the Veterans Legal Assistance Project (VLAP) volunteered at our one-day V… https://t.co/ywuPKxqQQg
    about 3 days ago
  • Article by Prof. Norman Silber and Alumnus Steven Stites ’13 Published in Virginia Law & Business Review https://t.co/NHY1aBK2jY
    about 3 days ago
  • Thanks for attending! https://t.co/E8SlaUtkwY
    about 6 days ago
  • Thank you for your continued support of the Law School! https://t.co/Jgi5kEF0QS
    about 6 days ago

Archives