Faculty

Prof. Irina Manta’s Co-Written Article “Litigating Citizenship” to Appear in Vanderbilt Law Review

Irina D. Manta, Professor of Law

The article “Litigating Citizenship,” co-written by Professor Irina D. Manta, founding director of the Center for Intellectual Property Law, with her former colleague Cassandra Burke Robertson, professor of law and director of the Center for Professional Ethics at Case Western Reserve University, has been accepted for publication in the Vanderbilt Law Review.

Abstract
By what standard of proof — and by what procedures — can the U.S. government challenge citizenship status? That question has taken on greater urgency in recent years. News reports discuss cases of individuals whose passports were suddenly denied, even after the government had previously recognized their citizenship for years or even decades. The government has also stepped up efforts to re-evaluate the naturalization files of other citizens and has asked for funding to litigate more than a thousand denaturalization cases. Likewise, citizens have gotten swept up in immigration enforcement actions, and thousands of citizens have been erroneously detained or removed from the United States. Most scholarly treatment of citizenship rights has focused on the substantive protection of those rights. But the procedures by which citizenship cases are litigated are just as important — and sometimes more important — to ensure that citizenship rights are safe.

This Article analyzes the due-process implications of citizenship litigation in the United States. It examines different stages at which the citizenship question is judicially resolved, including denaturalization, removal and exclusion, and restrictions on the exercise of citizenship rights such as voting, working, and traveling. The Article concludes that the structure of U.S. democracy relies on the stability of citizenship and requires heightened procedural protections when the government challenges an individual’s citizenship. In the words of Justice Felix Frankfurter, “The history of liberty has largely been the history of observance of procedural safeguards.” Those procedural safeguards are needed to ensure that the judicial branch can remain the stalwart protector of a key pillar of our constitutional democracy.

View the current draft of the article (PDF) on the SSRN website.

Latest Tweets

  • Law students in the Robert W. Entenmann Veterans Law Clinic presenting at tonight's “Know Your Rights” training for… https://t.co/sHRfZgvkLK
    about 3 days ago
  • Thanks for being on the panel! #HofstraLaw https://t.co/iJ4TTJXOhY
    about 3 days ago
  • Thank you for participating in the event! #HofstraLaw https://t.co/x85DNq7GQn
    about 3 days ago
  • Yesterday, more than 25 law students from the Veterans Legal Assistance Project (VLAP) volunteered at our one-day V… https://t.co/ywuPKxqQQg
    about 6 days ago
  • Article by Prof. Norman Silber and Alumnus Steven Stites ’13 Published in Virginia Law & Business Review https://t.co/NHY1aBK2jY
    about 6 days ago
  • Thanks for attending! https://t.co/E8SlaUtkwY
    about 1 week ago

Archives